Siesta resident files suit against the county over abandonment of North Beach Road segment

Author: Share:
North Beach Road

By Rachel Brown Hackney

North Beach Road
North Beach Road
          On the afternoon of May 24, Siesta Key resident and business owner Mike Consentino walked to the podium in the Sarasota County Commission Chambers in Sarasota during the Open to the Public period at the end of the board’s regular meeting.

Consentino talked of how he grew up on the mainland but has lived on Siesta for about 27 years. Then he mentioned how much he used to enjoy driving the length of North Beach Road. “Every day, when I’d get home from work, I would take that little slow roll down that beach … and just feel my heart rate come down and my blood pressure go down. It was an amazing thing.”

After repeated storm damage to a 360-foot segment of the road, county leaders closed it to vehicle traffic in 1993. Then, in a 4-1 vote on May 11 — with Commissioner Christine Robinson in the minority — the board agreed to abandon the section altogether, turning it over to three couples who own adjacent property.

Since then, Consentino said on May 24, “I’ve been very upset.”

He understood that an easement approved during the public hearing has been designed to ensure public access to the road will continue, Consentino told the board. But “‘in perpetuity’ is something that is certainly questionable.”

“I want to see you guys reconsider,” he said of the vote. “It’s very hard for me to understand how the board cannot only take that away [from the current members of the public], but you’re robbing future generations … I think it’s a terrible mistake.”

On June 10, the last day the law allowed for such action, Consentino filed a complaint against Sarasota County, alleging that the commission violated the Comprehensive Plan when it approved the abandonment of the segment of North Beach Road. The same section Robinson cited prior to her May 11 “No” vote is referenced in the complaint: Policy 1.1.13 says, “The County shall not vacate road segments on waterfronts along any creek, river, lake, bay or Gulf access point and shall encourage right-of-way use of these areas for coastal beach and bay access.”

“It doesn’t give us an out,” Robinson told her colleagues on May 11.

However, Charles Bailey III, an attorney with Parker Williams in Sarasota who represented the three couples petitioning for the abandonment, explained on May 11 that parcels they own seaward of the affected section of North Beach Road are on the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, Bailey argued, the segment of road at the heart of the petition technically is not on the waterfront.
Commissioner Charles Hines said he was willing to go along with that concept.

The road abandonment approval was necessary for plans of one couple among the petitioners — Dennis and Wendy Madden — to construct a new three-story structure with six dwelling units in place of five non-conforming buildings with 12 units that they have been renting out on the island. Without the extra property encompassed by the road section, they would have lacked sufficient square footage under the county’s Zoning Code to build six new units.

During a telephone interview with SNL on June 15, Ralf Brookes of Cape Coral, Consentino’s attorney, said of the commisioners, “They shouldn’t be giving away public access for the private sector.”

He lived on Siesta Key himself in the early 1990s, Brookes noted, and he, like Consentino, drove North Beach Road “all the time.” Brookes told the SNL, “This has been an important beachfront road for generations of Siesta Key residents.”

Bailey repeatedly pointed out to the commissioners on May 11 that the three couples petitioning for the road abandonment — J. Edward Ramsey and Christy S. Ramsey of Bristol, IN; the Maddens of Ada, MI; and William Caflisch and Sheila S. Caflisch of Sarasota — had no intention of keeping members of the public off the road, as long as they were not in vehicles, in compliance with the current county restriction. At Hines’ request prior to the vote, Bailey also won agreement from the couples for an additional “5-foot pedestrian or bicycle access out to the sandy beach that doesn’t exist today,” as Bailey put it, with a legal description that would be recorded in public documents.

Asked about a response from the county regarding the lawsuit, spokesman Jason Bartolone told SNL that the Office of the County Attorney typically does not issue any comment on pending litigation.

Seeking support

The county had not been served with the complaint as of June 15, spokesman Jason Bartolone told SNL, but Brookes explained during the telephone interview that he had cleared up a couple of technical issues noted by the Sarasota County Clerk of Court’s Office that had prevented the service.

As of the morning of June 16, the county formally was listed in court records as the defendant.

In the meantime, Mike Consentino has set up a website — — to seek support for his initiative to keep all of North Beach Road public property and donations “to help pay for our legal fees.” A button on the homepage clicks through to a GoFundMe page.

The matter of the resolution

Although the County Commission vote on the matter took place on May 11, the resolution setting forth that action in formal legal terms had not been finalized by June 15, SNL learned.

County Real Estate Division staff sent a draft to Bailey on May 13 with minor suggested changes, but he had not revised it and returned it with a signature as of midweek this week, Bartolone said.

Asked whether that would enable the Office of the County Attorney to seek dismissal of Consentino’s complaint, Brookes explained that his understanding of the law is that the date of the County Commission vote was the start of the 30-day period for Consentino to file a complaint. The fact that the resolution has not been finalized should not matter, he continued. However, if he had not filed the complaint within that 30-day timeframe, he added, the Office of the County Attorney would have had no problem getting a judge to dismiss the lawsuit.

His decision, Brookes said, was to “err on the side of caution.”

Sarasota attorney Morgan Bentley of the Bentley & Bruning firm — who has been involved in past litigation against the County Commission — confirmed Brookes’ position. In a June 15 telephone interview, he told SNL, “Ralf is right.” Bentley explained that, as a public body, the commission “can’t do anything after the public hearing,” so that May 11 action was final.

Overview of the petition to vacate Beach Road, County Commissioners voted;

•  Reduces the number of dwelling units from 12 to 6, built to current codes.

• The segment of Beach Road affected by the vacation petition is currently not open thoroughfare, and only for vehicular use by the property owners there.  Vacation of this segment relieves the County of the burden of maintaining this segment. The road has been closed on and off since 1993. Cost to repair over $2 million.

•  Public use of that section of road today, ie, walking and biking would not be affected by the vacation.

•  The project will lower the density of the immediate area.

•  The 3 lots on the beach, sea word of the vacated road which are privately owned will not be able to be developed and the public will now have an easement to cross it.

Siesta Sand
Author: Siesta Sand

Previous Article

County staff’s failure to comply with direction for inlet management strategy leads to board concerns about revising policy

Next Article

Sheriff’s Report May 17 – June  20, 2016